arcanetrivia: a light purple swirl on a darker purple background (Default)
some kind of snark faery ([personal profile] arcanetrivia) wrote2010-02-26 03:51 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

OMG! GAH! *hides under the desk*



(from Photoshop Disasters)

A commenter by the name of Jambalie says "it's official ladies - we can stop worrying about how our bodies look - men apparently don't know how they are supposed to look, anyhow!"

[identity profile] rattlesnakeroot.livejournal.com 2010-02-27 01:00 am (UTC)(link)

??? I need a good mental floss now. . . .

[identity profile] lilyevans-snape.livejournal.com 2010-02-27 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, this may not be as hug a Photoshop disaster as it looks. You can see a shot of the girls full naked torso, here: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_uB-BSH_BgAs/S037fq20f8I/AAAAAAAAIic/wCqAmvhwdEU/s1600-h/January+2010+A+Magazine+photo+Wayne+Maser+stylist+Sciascia+Gambaccini+model+Jessica+Hart+Women+Management+New+York+City+Blog+6 and she does seem to have very low set breasts. In fact, I wager to say that if she wasn't stretching up like that in the second picture, the bottom of her breasts would be falling right about where they are here. I think the real problem here is the over use of the liquify tool in narrowing her torso right under the breasts, and the fact that the angel of the black fabric is only serving to increase the effect. Needless to say, I've seen a lot worse.

In fact, this one (found on the same blog where you found yours): http://www.blogcdn.com/www.stylelist.com/media/2010/01/julianne-moore-bvlgari-ad-590ls011510.jpg is in my Vogue this month and is horrible. Unless she's somehow dislocated her right arm, there is no way that we could be seeing that much of her back, and still have her arm positioned where it is.

Or this freakish disaster 0_o: http://lh3.ggpht.com/_EHZsoUS6SIA/S1j413YjDwI/AAAAAAAAF7M/kAbKaaLXmkM/fembloodyina.jpg That one is really creeping me out! It reminds me of that enlarged mouth effect they used in the extended version of "Return of the King" for the Mouth of Sauron: http://anthroyogini.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/mouth_of_sauron1.jpg?w=500&h=304

[identity profile] lilyevans-snape.livejournal.com 2010-02-27 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
That would be not as 'huge' a Photoshop disaster, not 'hug'. Typo fail, once again. Though, I think there are probably a lot of photoshoppers out there who will need a hug after seeing their works torn to shreds on this guy's blog, lol.

[identity profile] cosmiccoz.livejournal.com 2010-02-27 08:01 am (UTC)(link)
How weird. Though it does look like both halves of her body (same tone, same shadow). I'd say two different pictures of the same model were mashed together. Just weird.

[identity profile] gichigami.livejournal.com 2010-02-27 03:03 pm (UTC)(link)
A Fembot taking aim with the booby guns?

[identity profile] valkyriur.livejournal.com 2010-02-27 05:47 pm (UTC)(link)
75 year old boobs on 25 year old lady??? nice.
enotsola: (Default)

[personal profile] enotsola 2010-02-27 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Ok, the Mouth of Sauron one I gotta agree with. That one freaked me right out when it came up on the RSS for the photoshop disasters blog.. yikes..

However, I have to argue on this one. I took those two pics of her, lined up the facial features, and there's no chance they're the same torso, even accounting for her stretching. http://sexy-supermodel.blogspot.com/2009/04/jessica-hart-hottest-photos.html is some more of the same girl. Sure, she's a model, and thus looks like an alien, but nowhere near as scary as if you just scroll up.

I suppose it could be argued that all those photos were 'shopped to make her look more like a human being, but still.

[identity profile] lilyevans-snape.livejournal.com 2010-02-27 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually, looking at the photos of her that you linked to on the supermodel.blogspot, it does look to me as though the whole other series has been shopped, and not very well, as she looks much more attractive and 'normal' (in a way that cannot just be chalked up to cosmetics and lighting) in the supermodel blog ones than she did in first series. There is something oddly tweaked about her figure in a lot of the series: http://womenmanagement.blogspot.com/2010/01/magazine-january-2010-jessica-hart-ph.html. In fact if you compare her navel in the original one Lisa posted, the one I posted where she is stretching up, and then this one, that you linked me to: http://i.cdn.turner.com/si/pr/subs/swimsuit/images/09_jessica-hart_behind_14.jpg , they all seem to be different, and I don't think it is just a case of how she is sitting or standing.

Jesus, this poor girl is getting pieced together like Frankenstein's monster, it seems. Soon they'll just stop hiring models altogether, and instead keep a bank of stock photos of various body parts and piece them together.

[identity profile] wordfuzion.livejournal.com 2010-02-28 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)
The stuff of nightmares.