![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Would you consider gaining of sexual favors by use of a straightforward aphrodisiac/lust potion/love potion, used specifically by one person on another for this purpose (rather than by accident), to be dub-con or non-con?
Me, I'd consider this dub-con. The subject is conscious and otherwise in possession of all his faculties; he might do things he otherwise wouldn't have done, but they aren't being directly or violently forced. You might call it coercion, I guess.
Anyway, I don't want to under-warn so I thought I'd ask y'all's opinions?
Me, I'd consider this dub-con. The subject is conscious and otherwise in possession of all his faculties; he might do things he otherwise wouldn't have done, but they aren't being directly or violently forced. You might call it coercion, I guess.
Anyway, I don't want to under-warn so I thought I'd ask y'all's opinions?
no subject
Date: February 9th, 2011 08:42 pm (UTC)From:This is really complicated because I know the outcome of the story, but am trying to warn based on what it would look like at first (and I know some people who are triggered by what looks like consent issues would not be reassured by knowing it comes out a bit different in the end).
no subject
Date: February 9th, 2011 08:49 pm (UTC)From:You could warn for both dub-con and love potions (or what have you). I think people would have a pretty good idea of what they're getting into at that point.